jump to navigation

Demystifying NHL rules, Part 3 September 14, 2009

Posted by calvin in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

86.6 Pre-Game Warm-Up – During the pre-game warm-up (which shall not exceed sixteen (16) minutes in duration) and before the commencement of play in any period, each team shall confine its activity to its own end of the rink. Refer to Rule 47.9 – Fighting. <– HEE.

No warm-up involving pucks on the ice shall be permitted for a goalkeeper at the start of any period. If, after one warning, this continues, the Referee shall assess a delay of game penalty to the offending team.

Ok, I get that they don’t want team brawls breaking out during warm-ups, but it’s kind of funny. “Ok, boys, here’s the masking tape dividing the ice. You step on the other side and you’re in Time Out. We mean it!”

Also, I had no idea goalkeepers couldn’t warm up. I guess I should have since I’ve never seen it happen but I never thought about it.

On another note: Welcome back, you little punk. Try to try.

Staffy looks shocked that he's dating Thomas Vanek

Staffy looks shocked that he's dating Thomas Vanek


Demystifying NHL rules – part 2 September 11, 2009

Posted by calvin in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Captaincy: now here’s one that seems to get broken all the time…

Here’s the rule:

One Captain shall be appointed by each team, and he alone shall have the privilege of discussing with the Referee any questions relating to interpretation of rules which may arise during the progress of a game. He shall wear the letter “C,” approximately three inches (3”) in height and in contrasting color, in a conspicuous position on the front of his sweater. No co-Captains are permitted. Either one Captain and no more than two Alternate Captains, or no Captain an no more than three Alternate Captains are permitted (see 6.2).

Only the Captain, when invited to do so by the Referee, shall have the privilege of discussing any point relating to the interpretation of rules. Any Captain, Alternate Captain or any player or goalkeeper who comes off the bench and makes any protest or intervention with the officials for any purpose shall be assessed a minor penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct under Rule 40 – Abuse of Officials. Should this protest continue, he may be assessed a misconduct penalty, and if it further continues, a game misconduct penalty shall be warranted.

A complaint about a penalty is NOT a matter “relating to the interpretation of the rules” and a minor penalty shall be imposed against any Captain, Alternate Captain or any other player or goalkeeper making such a complaint.

The Referee and Official Scorer shall be advised, prior to the start of each game, the name of the Captain and the Alternate Captains of both teams.

No playing Coach or playing Manager or goalkeeper shall be permitted to act as Captain or Alternate Captain.

Ok, now that we’ve got that out of the way… let’s think about how often that rule gets broken. First, the whole “one captain” thing. I think they mean only one captain at a time. Otherwise the co-captains the Sabres had a few years ago would be illegal. It would also mean that the rotating captaincy would not be allowed.

Then there’s the matter of the penalty protest. Seriously? Even if a captain or an alternate captain complains they get a penalty? Rightttt. Considering Derek Roy doesn’t often wear a letter it would seem he should be spending a lot of quality time in the box if that rule was enforced.

So. Does the rule just not get enforced?

Demystifying NHL rules, part 1 September 9, 2009

Posted by calvin in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,

I’ve been reading up on this whole “you can’t send a player to the AHL if he still has junior eligibility” thing. I’ve never understood why on earth a player had to go back to juniors – after all, if they were almost good enough to make an NHL team wouldn’t they benefit more from being in the NHL than yawning their way through another season in juniors?

Here’s the official rule: A junior-aged player with an NHL contract cannot be sent to a minor pro league like the AHL unless he has already played four seasons of junior hockey. He must either stay on the NHL roster or return to junior.

But what’s with the four seasons of junior hockey? According to About.com, the rule is in place to protect junior hockey players and junior teams, ensuring that NHL clubs will retain only those teenagers who are ready for the big leagues.

I buy that, but with the salary cap and the 23-man roster in effect, doesn’t this rule become kind of a moot point? No, not a mute point, a moot point. Your thoughts?

%d bloggers like this: